In October 2009, Gordon Campbell assembled a Local Government Elections Task Force consisting of members of the Legislative Assembly and the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM). The members are UBCM President Harry Nyce, MLA Bill Bennett, Surrey Councillor Barbara Steele, Quesnel Mayor Mary Sjostorm, MLA Donna Barnett and MLA Douglas Horne. The purpose of the task force is to review the current municipal election process and recommend necessary reforms to the provincial government.
The task force are to review campaign financing, enforcement processes and outcomes, role of the Chief Electoral Officer in local government elections, the election cycle, the availability of corporate vote and other matters that will be raised.
One of the minor topics that were discussed during the Coquitlam Municipal By-Elections were the availability of a corporate vote. Councillor Linda Reimer is the only councillor from Coquitlam City Council who have came forward and expressed her support for corporate votes. There are four other councillors and four other mayors in British Columbia who have supported this cause.
The Tri-City News interviewed SFU Political Science Professor Patrick Smith. Throughout the interview, the message that Dr. Smith was trying to portray was clear — businesses are well represented and should not have a business vote.
Currently, corporations and small business can finance municipal election campaigns by donating to the campaign. They are not able to vote for the candidate unless they own a house in the city.
I believe that having a business vote on a municipal level for small business owners who live outside the city is legitimate. In Coquitlam, the taxes that a small business owner pays is 3–4 times higher than the taxes of a residential owner. Throughout my municipal campaign, business owners in Coquitlam have complained about how much taxes have increased for their businesses — but they do not get more services out of the taxes that they pay.
Business votes were legal in British Columbia prior to 1993. They were stopped by the Harcourt New Democrat government. The reasons for discontinuing the corporate vote was because
- Desire to apply ‘one person, one vote’ principle
- Criteria for eligibility for a business vote was complex and at times difficult for local governments to verify
- Potential for abuse of the provisions led to fairness concerns – e.g. corporations were able to rent a parking space or storage locker and be eligible for a vote; tenant in occupation provisions (applicable to both corporations and individuals) allowed lessees of small fractions of property to vote (in one case, about 500 people registered to vote in relation to one parcel of land)
- Not many businesses were eligible to vote — the effectiveness of the vote on addressing business concerns was arguably minimal
- UBCM supported removal of the corporate vote
The responsibilities of the municipal government are not written into our Canadian Constitution. The municipal government is viewed as an extension of the provincial government. Municipal governments have the power to create by-laws (ie smoking ban), contract garbage pickup, residential/commercial zoning and others.
What is your opinion on corporate and small business votes in municipal elections?
The functionality of WhatsApp Messenger is very similar to
what are they saying?